The GOP Has It Backwards

Sara Marie Brenner

Recently, former Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney explained that he believed his loss was due, in part, to President Barack Obama’s bestowing “gifts” on segments of American society. He explained Obama’s gifts as:

  • Obamacare’s provisions allowing children to stay on their parents’ health insurance plans through age 26
  • A program that caps federal student loan payments at 10 percent of income and forgives any remaining debt after 20 years of consistent payments
  • Temporary deportation exemptions granted to young illegal immigrants who meet certain requirements
  • Requirement that most employers provide health insurance covering birth control

Of course, there are voters who made a decision based on these points. The question is whether there were enough voters in this category to truly put President Obama over the top. In my opinion from reviewing the data, this is not the reason that the Republican party lost the election.

Republicans stayed home due to Ron Paul’s wing of the party who would never embrace Mitt Romney as an alternative to Obama. Rather, they believed Romney to be the same as Obama — a belief which could not be further from reality. In addition, some Republican women either did not vote for president or stayed home altogether, unable to get past the remarks made by some GOP candidates that made the party appear to be anti-woman. Unfortunately, the Republicans allowed the liberals to run away with that meme, framing the Republicans as a bunch of old white guys wanting to cast women back to the 1950s. That was target marketing toward women, and it worked.

Interestingly, there seems to be a divide growing among the younger generations of Republican leadership. Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal recently said, “We have got to stop dividing the American voters. We need to go after 100 percent of the votes, not 53 percent. We need to go after every single vote. … So I absolutely reject [Romney’s] notion, that description. I think it’s absolutely wrong.”

With all due respect to both distinguished gentlemen, they are both absolutely wrong.

The Republican Party prides itself on being the party of job creation — the GOP is supposedly pro-business, pro-capitalism and pro-growth. Why, then, are they anti-marketing? Any good business target-markets. This is how they communicate to their potential customers based on age, gender, income, experience, education, personality, buying habits and other criteria that are measured and studied by companies who make this their focus. If businesses do it in order to capture certain segments of the market, why wouldn’t the Republican Party do it to capture certain segments of the electorate?

The Democrat Party does this, and they do it brilliantly. They market to women in one way, Hispanics in another, men differently, and so on, shifting their message slightly to engage and interest the segment of the electorate (market) they wish to reach. Republicans frequently make fun of the Democrats for doing this, saying, why can’t we just be one America? We certainly are one America, but we are not all the same nor should we ever claim to be. Each person is unique, interesting, and different, and we celebrate this as Americans. We have always believed that America is where many people — who all have varying backgrounds, beliefs, thoughts, skills, talents, levels of intelligence, ideas and more — come together to work toward a common goal. However, that doesn’t mean that you forget your instincts, your religion, your family or your traditions. By marketing to those segments of the electorate, the Democrats were able to show whatever group of people with whom they were communicating that they care (we can argue whether they really do care), understand and would work for them. It is that target marketing that is so important to the manner in which we win votes.

When Rush Limbaugh says that if we reach out to women voters it means we have to become pro-abortion, he’s wrong. I am in no way suggesting that we give up our principles; however, I certainly am promoting that we communicate just like the successful business owners within the Republican Party — by micro-targeting segments of the population, and communicating based on the touch-points that are relevant to them. This is how you win clients, and, it’s how you win votes.

The Republican Party needs to look no further than its financiers – the men and women who funded Karl Rove have been brilliant in their business life, but seem to think that the same advertising and marketing principles should stop at the door of their company. The GOP has it backwards: rather than criticizing Democrats for target marketing and refusing to engage in it, the Republicans simply need to apply business principles to campaigning, and the war of ideas will be won.

In 2014, the Republicans have to stop thinking everyone is a carbon copy of the person next to them. We are all different, and by any means that people may be grouped for the purposes of marketing and communications, the Republicans must take advantage of that opportunity — as the Democrats have — or lose the communications battle, and the election.


In a future column, we will provide comparisons and contrasts with specific examples.


  1. Well-reasoned, rational work.

    I fear reason is not a defense in these times. Irrational hatred, name-calling, lying and misrepresenting are the Obama weapons. He purports to lead, but feeds the baseness of men’s souls.

    One of two sides was to win – the one who wanted it most. It was intolerable for evil to lose. Last-minute panic forced the Dems to bus enough voters to enough double-votes to win. That they overdid it and the polls now show 104% turnout is the only evidence we have.

    We conservatives can’t even imagine the destructive instincts in play here, much less mimic them. We didn’t play dirty enough.

    My comfort is that they now own the coming mess. The comfortable, stylish, well-fed, highly educated, tolerant populace that elected him will feel the pinch. Let it come.

  2. Oh Sara, sometimes I just wish you could understand the Ron Paul viewpoint a little better. It is an ideology that we are on the wrong track and have been for quite some time. The size and scope of the federal government has grown much beyond what the Constitution intended. If we want to solve our fiscal crisis, we need to begin there. Show me where in the Constitution the federal government has the authority to regulate education? You can’t. Despite this, the Dept. of Education spends millions of dollars telling the states how to handle something the Constitution specifically leaves up to the states. That is just one example. Mitt Romney did not offer a plan to address this. We simply cannot afford to continue down this path. How does the Republican party claim to be “small government” yet when it comes to opportunities to actually downsize, they offer nothing substantial? And I cannot fail to mention the party of “small government” wants to tell you who you can and cannot marry. We also live in a country where the military is permitted to arrest and detain American citizens, without a warrant, indefinitely. Our civil liberties are under fire and Romney didn’t speak out against this either but rather stated he supported it. Our meddling in foreign affairs has us involved in costly military conflicts, most without Congressional approval as the Constition requires. I recently visited a German town that had more Americans living there on the military base than German citizens in the whole town. World War II ended a long time ago. Can we afford to have thousands of troops stationed around the world, in 108 countries, most of whom we haven’t been at war with ever or for over 50 years? The answer is no. We cannot afford it. That is the reality. Removing the Republican label from Romney, it was hard to distinguish him on anything of value TO ME and other Ron Paul Republicans. I don’t know why that is so difficult to see. I wanted a candidate who stood firm on the issue of liberty and he just missed the mark completely. I couldn’t vote for him because my dealbreaker issues – the Constitution, civil liberties, aggressive foreign policy – were indistinguishable from Obama’s. This is the first election I didn’t vote Republican and I will not come back until candidates stop the rhetoric and actually roll up their sleeves and deal with the real issues facing America. We are broke and we need to stop pretending we are not.

    • Not agreeing with something doesn’t mean I don’t understand it. There are actually many aspects of his national/domestic policy with which I agree — you’ve mentioned some here. However, I completely disagree with his foreign policy, and cannot get past that. I believe the world is safer when the United States is a strong, world leader. That doesn’t mean we have to be in 108 countries — I agree with you there. But, it does mean that we get involved to keep the world in order. It only makes us safer.

      Paul seems to make much of this to be more about his ego than he does the country. When Romney was the nominee, he wouldn’t endorse, support and back him as the better alternative to Obama. Instead, we’re stuck with Obama for four more years, partially because Paul was too selfish to not be the focus of the party. Actually, he could have been the focus had he supported Romney — that would have been major news, and we may not be looking at a very frightening second term of Barack Obama.

  3. I give the government a “gift” of taxes and they hopefully help people with “gifts” when they need it. I’m all for people getting “gifts” even when it does not benefit me directly. Just because its the right thing to do. Seems legit to me.


  1. […] Actually, we believe Jindal doesn’t get it, either. Sara Marie Brenner explains this in, “The GOP Has It Backwards.“ […]

  2. […] The GOP has it backwards: […]

  3. […] The GOP Has It Backwards ( […]

Leave a comment or question. Report abusive, harassing or annoying behavior by clicking on Tips/Contact in the top menu.

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: